수정: Bifactor 모형을 적용한 CES-D 척도의 요인구조 검증

Correction to: A Bifactor Approach to the Factor Structure Study of the CES-D Scale

Article information

STRESS. 2018;26(3):257-257
Publication date (electronic) : 2018 September 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.17547/kjsr.2018.26.3.257
신재은1, 이태헌1, 윤소진1
중앙대학교 심리학과
Department of Psychology, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea

Stress 2017;25(4):272-278

http://doi.org/10.17547/kjsr.2017.25.4.272

[Table 3의 내용이 누락되어 아래와 같이 수정 합니다.]

Standardized factor loadings and uniqueness of the CES-D-K (20-Item)

p. 277 우울감정, 긍정적 감정, 신체 및 행동 둔화, 대인관계에 대한 하위척도 오메가 위계 계수(ωHS)는 각각 0.036, 0.288, 0.085, 0.269이며

⇒ 우울감정, 긍정적 감정, 신체 및 행동 둔화, 대인관계에 대한 하위척도 오메가 위계 계수(ωHS)는 각각 0.036, 0.285, 0.085, 0.294이며

Article information Continued

Table 3

Standardized factor loadings and uniqueness of the CES-D-K (20-Item)

 Item No. One–Factor Four-Factor Bifactor



Depression Depressed Affect Positive Affect Somatic Symptoms Interpersonal Difficulties General Depressed Affect Positive Affect Somatic Symptoms Interpersonal Difficulties Uniqueness
CESD1 .642 .660 .599 .666 0.197
CESD2 .495 .507 .471 .297 0.690
CESD3 .773 .776 .776 .057 0.395
CESD4 .786 .806 .764 .328 0.309
CESD5R .730 .864 .707 .624 0.111
CESD6 .842 .846 .844 .086 0.280
CESD7 .824 .847 .811 .227 0.291
CESD8 .850 .872 .851 .089 0.268
CESD9 .762 .764 .787 −.159 0.355
CESD10R .509 .598 .486 .407 0.599
CESD11 .564 .578 .565 .061 0.678
CESD12 .758 .761 .771 −.046 0.403
CESD13 .640 .655 .626 .204 0.566
CESD14 .782 .785 .775 .202 0.359
CESD15R .763 .900 .747 .351 0.319
CESD16 .704 .841 .690 .518 0.256
CESD17 .765 .769 .749 .548 0.138
CESD18 .774 .778 .760 .408 0.256
CESD19 .815 .980 .805 .518 0.084
CESD20 .832 .850 .856 −.099 0.258
1
.805 1
.971 .791 1
.856 .722 .732 1